|
Category
|
Exemplary
4
|
Accomplished
3
|
Developing
2
|
Beginning
1
|
Score
|
|
Content
|
Covers topic in depth.
Elaborates throughtout. Subject knowledge is evident (more
than required).
|
Includes essential
information. Subject knowledge is evident in much of the
product.
|
Fulfills minimal topic
requirements. Some subject knowledge is evident, but some is
incorrect or confusing.
|
Subject knowledge is not
evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or
flawed.
|
|
|
Mechanics
|
Presentation has not
misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has fewer
than two missipellings or grammatical
errors.
|
Presentation has three or
more misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has four or
more spelling or grammatical errors.
|
|
|
Presentation
|
Uses original approach
effectively. Highly organized.
|
Interesting. Logical
order.
|
Clear and understandable.
Uses appropriate language.
|
No logical sequence of
events.
|
|
|
Originality
|
Product shows evidence of
original thought. Ideas are inventive and based on logical
conclusions and sound research.
|
Product shows original
thought. Work extends beyond other people's ideas and shows
new insights.
|
This work is a rather
large collection and rehash of other people's ideas. There
is no evidence of new thought or
inventiveness.
|
This work is minimal
collection and rehash of other people's ideas. There is no
evidence of original thought..
|
|
|
Teamwork
|
The work load was divided
and shared equally by all team members.
|
Most team members
contributed their fair share of the work.
|
Most team members
participated in some aspect of the work, but workloads
varied.
|
The work load was not
divided equally and few team members contributed their fair
share.
|
|